"Exploring Interconnectedness: COVID-19, Russia-Ukraine War, and U.S.-China Agricultural Futures Markets"
Captivating Global Crises Reshape Agricultural Futures Linkages
In a groundbreaking study, a team of researchers has shed light on how the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war have dramatically reshaped the connections between the U.S. and Chinese agricultural futures markets. Using cutting-edge techniques like wavelet coherence analysis and time-varying parameter vector autoregression, the researchers have uncovered a fascinating tale of market dynamics that has profound implications for policymakers and investors alike.
The study focuses on three major agricultural commodities - soybeans, corn, and cotton - which are actively traded in both the U.S. and Chinese futures markets. The findings are nothing short of remarkable. The researchers discovered that the pandemic and the war have significantly altered the correlation and lead-lag relationships between the U.S. and Chinese soybean and corn futures returns, but have had little impact on the cotton futures markets.
Notably, the U.S. agricultural markets emerged as the dominant force, transmitting more volatility risk to the Chinese markets than the other way around. Moreover, the risk spillover enhancement effect from the war was found to be stronger than that from the pandemic, a trend that was particularly pronounced in the soybean and corn futures markets.
The researchers also delved deeper, employing sophisticated VAR models to uncover the causal and risk transmission relationships between the U.S. and Chinese soybean futures markets during the crisis periods. Their analysis revealed a startling discovery - the impulse response from the Chinese soybean market to a U.S. shock was much stronger and more persistent during the Russia-Ukraine war period than during the COVID-19 period.
Furthermore, the variance contribution from the U.S. soybean market to Chinese market fluctuations was found to be much stronger than the reverse, and the war had enhanced such cross-market variance contributions from China more significantly than from the U.S.
These findings have profound implications for policymakers and investors navigating the turbulent waters of global agricultural markets. Policymakers can use this knowledge to formulate policies that mitigate the risks of market contagion and enhance the resilience of the soybean and corn futures markets. Investors, on the other hand, can leverage this understanding to develop more effective risk management strategies and diversify their portfolios to reduce their exposure to market-specific shocks.
In a world where global crises can rewrite the rules of market dynamics, this groundbreaking study serves as a beacon of insight, guiding stakeholders through the complex interplay of international agricultural futures markets. As the global economy continues to grapple with the aftermath of the pandemic and the ongoing geopolitical tensions, this research stands as a testament to the power of rigorous analysis in unlocking the secrets of our interconnected world.
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-02852-6
In a groundbreaking study, a team of researchers has shed light on how the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war have dramatically reshaped the connections between the U.S. and Chinese agricultural futures markets. Using cutting-edge techniques like wavelet coherence analysis and time-varying parameter vector autoregression, the researchers have uncovered a fascinating tale of market dynamics that has profound implications for policymakers and investors alike.
The study focuses on three major agricultural commodities - soybeans, corn, and cotton - which are actively traded in both the U.S. and Chinese futures markets. The findings are nothing short of remarkable. The researchers discovered that the pandemic and the war have significantly altered the correlation and lead-lag relationships between the U.S. and Chinese soybean and corn futures returns, but have had little impact on the cotton futures markets.
Notably, the U.S. agricultural markets emerged as the dominant force, transmitting more volatility risk to the Chinese markets than the other way around. Moreover, the risk spillover enhancement effect from the war was found to be stronger than that from the pandemic, a trend that was particularly pronounced in the soybean and corn futures markets.
The researchers also delved deeper, employing sophisticated VAR models to uncover the causal and risk transmission relationships between the U.S. and Chinese soybean futures markets during the crisis periods. Their analysis revealed a startling discovery - the impulse response from the Chinese soybean market to a U.S. shock was much stronger and more persistent during the Russia-Ukraine war period than during the COVID-19 period.
Furthermore, the variance contribution from the U.S. soybean market to Chinese market fluctuations was found to be much stronger than the reverse, and the war had enhanced such cross-market variance contributions from China more significantly than from the U.S.
These findings have profound implications for policymakers and investors navigating the turbulent waters of global agricultural markets. Policymakers can use this knowledge to formulate policies that mitigate the risks of market contagion and enhance the resilience of the soybean and corn futures markets. Investors, on the other hand, can leverage this understanding to develop more effective risk management strategies and diversify their portfolios to reduce their exposure to market-specific shocks.
In a world where global crises can rewrite the rules of market dynamics, this groundbreaking study serves as a beacon of insight, guiding stakeholders through the complex interplay of international agricultural futures markets. As the global economy continues to grapple with the aftermath of the pandemic and the ongoing geopolitical tensions, this research stands as a testament to the power of rigorous analysis in unlocking the secrets of our interconnected world.
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-02852-6
Comments
Post a Comment